The Role of Rationality in Metaethics

Authors

  • Farrux Usmonov University of Economics and Pedagogy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/webofscientist.v5i4.54

Keywords:

Metaethics, Rationality, Moral Reasoning, Ethical Language, Normative Ethics, Moral Judgment, Cognitivism, Non-Cognitivism, Moral Philosophy, Justification

Abstract

The article explores the role of rationality in metaethics, focusing on how reason shapes moral judgments, ethical language, and normative justification. It examines various philosophical perspectives on the relationship between rational thought and moral values, highlighting the debates between cognitivist and non-cognitivist approaches. The study emphasizes that rationality serves as a crucial tool for analyzing moral concepts, resolving ethical dilemmas, and evaluating the consistency of moral beliefs. By situating rationality at the core of metaethical inquiry, the article underscores its significance in understanding the foundations of moral discourse and decision-making

References

A.J. Ayer — Language, Truth and Logic (1936)

Agarwal, U. (2024). Ethical Reasoning and Moral Value Alignment of LLMs Depend on the Language we Prompt them in. 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics Language Resources and Evaluation Lrec Coling 2024 Main Conference Proceedings, 6330–6340.

Argetsinger, H. (2022). Blame for me and Not for Thee: Status Sensitivity and Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 25(2), 265–282. ISSN 1386-2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10274-z

Bernard Williams — Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (1985)

Canavotto, I. (2022). Piecemeal Knowledge Acquisition for Computational Normative Reasoning. AIES 2022 Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics and Society, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534182

Colt, H. (2024). Right, Wrong, and In-Between: Medical Ethics. Cinemeducation Volume 2: Using Film and Other Visual Media in Graduate and Medical Education, 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003579618-50

G.E. Moore — Principia Ethica (1903)

G.E. Murning — Ethics: Fundamental Principles (1907)

Ganiyev E. Stages of development and impact on social life of an informed society in Uzbekistan. Western European Journal of Historical Events and Social Science, 2024, Т. 2, №. 11, С. 17–20.

Ingram, G.P.D. (2021). Dual-Process Theories, Cognitive Decoupling and the Outcome-to-Intent Shift: A Developmental Perspective on Evolutionary Ethics. Synthese Library, 437, 17–40. ISSN 0166-6991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68802-8_2

J.L. Mackie — Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (1977)

Johnson, S.B. (2022). Ethical Reasoning During a Pandemic: Results of a Five Country European Study. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 13(2), 67–78. ISSN 2329-4515. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2040645

Kok, N. (2024). Evaluating the use of casuistry during moral case deliberation in the ICU: A multiple qualitative case study. Social Science and Medicine, 345. ISSN 0277-9536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116662

Mavlyanovna, A. M. Artistic Creativity as a phenomenon of culture and spirituality (axiological approach). Web of Humanities: Journal of Social Science and Humanitarian Research, 2023, Т. 1, №. 2, С. 10–14.

Newman, L.E. (2022). Reassessing the Role of Narrative within Legal Approaches to Contemporary Jewish Ethics. Journal of Jewish Ethics, 8(1), 87–110. ISSN 2334-1777. https://doi.org/10.5325/jjewiethi.8.1.0087

R.M. Hare — The Language of Morals (1952)

Rizaev, I. I. Mehanizmy samoorganizacii social'nyh sistem. Jekonomika i socium, 2019, №. 3 (58), С. 368.

Ryazanov, A.A. (2021). Sensitivity to shifts in probability of harm and benefit in moral dilemmas. Cognition, 209. ISSN 0010-0277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104548

Sticker, M. (2022). Who is Rationalising? On an Overlooked Problem for Kant’s Moral Psychology and Method of Ethics. Kantian Journal, 41(1), 7–39. ISSN 0207-6918. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2022-1-1

Theisen, M. (2024). Uncertain Facts or Uncertain Values? Testing the Distinction Between Empirical and Normative Uncertainty in Moral Judgments. Cognitive Science, 48(3). ISSN 0364-0213. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13422

Tomašovičová, J. (2024). The relevance of the narrative approach in bioethics. World Literature Studies, 16(2), 78–88. ISSN 1337-9275. https://doi.org/10.31577/WLS.2024.16.2.7

Usmonov, F. N. The Role of Scientific Ethics and Bioethics in Modern Society. Design Engineering, 2021, С. 8373–8379.

Woodgate, J. (2024). Macro Ethics Principles for Responsible AI Systems: Taxonomy and Directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(11). ISSN 0360-0300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3672394

Yuldasheva, D. Philosophical Aspects of Bioethics Problems in Modern Science. 2023.

Yuldashevna, Y. D. Philosophy of Education: Exploring Different Philosophical Approaches to Education and Their Implications for Teaching and Learning.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-11

How to Cite

Farrux Usmonov. (2025). The Role of Rationality in Metaethics. Web of Scientist International Scientific Research Journal, 5(4), 7. https://doi.org/10.47134/webofscientist.v5i4.54

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.