The Phenomenon and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Youth Worldview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/webofscientist.v5i4.52Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Ethics, Youth Worldview, Autonomous Systems, Philosophical Ethics, Metaethics, Human Values, Technological Transformation, AI RegulationAbstract
The phenomenon of artificial intelligence (AI) has become a central focus in discussions about the digital transformation of society, particularly in how it shapes the worldview of younger generations. This paper explores the ethical implications of AI development and its influence on youth perception, decision-making, and value formation. While some experts argue that digital ethics is simply traditional ethics in a new context, others emphasize the unique challenges posed by autonomous AI systems. The discussion includes philosophical perspectives, such as those of Ludwig Feuerbach and Norbert Wiener, and touches on contemporary debates, including concerns about AI autonomy and its potential to either support or threaten human well-being. The paper argues for a comprehensive metaethical framework and regulatory principles to ensure responsible AI integration into human life
References
Banafa, A. (2023). Transformative AI: Responsible, Transparent, and Trustworthy AI Systems. Transformative AI Responsible Transparent and Trustworthy AI Systems, 1–156.
Bangui, H. (2023). Social Internet of Things: Ethical AI Principles in Trust Management. Procedia Computer Science, 220, 553–560. ISSN 1877-0509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.03.070
Floridi, L. (2024). INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUES The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Exacerbated Problems, Renewed Problems, Unprecedented Problems. American Philosophical Quarterly, 61(4), 301–307. ISSN 0003-0481. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.61.4.01
Kalenzi, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: How Should Emerging Technologies Be Governed? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 7. ISSN 2504-0537. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.801549
Levy, S. How Elon Musk and Y Combinator Plan to Stop Computers From Taking Over. Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/backchannel/how elon-musk-and-y-combinator-plan-to-stop-computers-from-taking-over 17e0e27dd02a (accessed July 6, 2018).
Makhamadaminovich, S. M. Ethnic Factors And Attitudes Towards Human Capital Development. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations Research, 3(01), 118–130. 2021.
Maphosa, V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and State Power. 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Big Data Computing and Data Communication Systems Icabcd 2023 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/icABCD59051.2023.10220459
Milosevic, Z. (2024). Towards Responsible Digital Twins. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 498, 123–138. ISSN 1865-1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54712-6_8
Neves, M. P. (2024). Before and Beyond Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges. Law Governance and Technology Series, 58, 107–125. ISSN 2352-1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41264-6_6
Paes, V. M. (2023). Social Impacts of Artificial Intelligence and Mitigation Recommendations: An Exploratory Study. Smart Innovation Systems and Technologies, 207, 521–528. ISSN 2190-3018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04435-9_54
Sodirjonov, M. M. Education as the most important factor of human capital development. Theoretical & Applied Science, 2020(4), 901–905. (-ISSN: 2308-4944 (print), e-ISSN: 2409-0085 (online). Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-04-84-161. https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS)
Sodirjonov, M. M. Ethnic Factors And Attitudes Towards Human Capital Development. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations Research, 3(1), 118–130. 2021. (Impact factor 2021: 5.676. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume03Issue01-19)
Sodirjonov, M. M. Ethnosociological factors of social transformation in modern Uzbekistan. In Актуальные вопросы формирования и развития научного пространства: Материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Отв. ред. А. А. Зарайский. Саратов, 2020, С. 27–35.
Sodirjonov, M. M. On the coverage of ethnic processes in the information space. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), 9(6), 165–171. 2020. (ISSN: 2278-4853. Impact Factor: SJIF 2020 = 6.882. DOI: 10.5958/2278-4853.2020.00197.4)
Sodirjonov, M. M. Social capital issues in the modern Uzbek society. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 5(1), 148–150. January 2020. (SJIF Impact Factor: 6.260. ISI I.F. Value: 1.241. Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016. ISSN: 2455-7838)
Sodirjonov, M. M. Some Thoughts On The Evolution Of Approaches To The Concept Of Human Capital. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 2(08), 144–150. 2020. (Impact factor 2020: 5.525. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue08-21)
Sodirjonov, M. M. The Essence of Social Capital Consequences and Their Influences to the Modern Society. Вестник науки и образования, 2–2, 113–116. 2020.
Srimathi, J. (2023). AI-Enhanced Multi-Cloud Security Management: Ensuring Robust Cybersecurity in Hybrid Cloud Environments. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Innovative Computing Intelligent Communication and Smart Electrical Systems Icses 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSES60034.2023.10465550
Wiener, N. Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1965.
Wiener, N. (1960). Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation. Science, 131(3410), 1355–1358.
Иванов, А. А. (2021). Цифровая этика и право. Закон, №4, 67–73.
Карпов, В. Э., Готовцев, П. М., Ройзензон, Г. В. (2018). Об этике и системах искусственного интеллекта. Философия и общество, Вып. 2 (87), 85–102.
Мирзиёев, Ш. (2017). Критический анализ, жесткая дисциплина и персональная ответственность должны стать повседневной нормой в деятельности каждого руководителя. Ташкент: Узбекистан, с. 104.
Разин, А. В. (2019). Этика искусственного интеллекта. Философия и общество, №1, 57–73.
Фейербах, Л. (1995). Эвдемонизм. В: Соч.: в 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Наука.
